🔗 Share this article

Throughout the beginning sections of Authentic: The Myth of Bringing Your Full Self to Work, speaker the author poses a challenge: commonplace advice to “be yourself” or “show up completely genuine at work” are not benevolent calls for personal expression – they can be pitfalls. Her first book – a mix of recollections, studies, cultural commentary and interviews – seeks to unmask how companies take over individual identity, transferring the weight of corporate reform on to staff members who are already vulnerable.

Personal Journey and Broader Context

The driving force for the work lies partially in the author’s professional path: various roles across corporate retail, emerging businesses and in worldwide progress, filtered through her experience as a Black disabled woman. The two-fold position that Burey faces – a tension between asserting oneself and aiming for security – is the engine of Authentic.

It emerges at a moment of general weariness with corporate clichés across America and other regions, as resistance to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs mount, and many organizations are cutting back the very frameworks that earlier assured transformation and improvement. Burey delves into that landscape to argue that retreating from authenticity rhetoric – specifically, the corporate language that trivializes identity as a grouping of appearances, quirks and hobbies, leaving workers preoccupied with managing how they are perceived rather than how they are regarded – is not a solution; we must instead reframe it on our own terms.

Marginalized Workers and the Performance of Persona

Via vivid anecdotes and interviews, Burey illustrates how underrepresented staff – employees from diverse backgrounds, LGBTQ+ individuals, women workers, people with disabilities – learn early on to modulate which self will “fit in”. A vulnerability becomes a liability and people compensate excessively by working to appear acceptable. The act of “presenting your true self” becomes a display surface on which various types of assumptions are placed: emotional work, revealing details and continuous act of thankfulness. In Burey’s words, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but absent the safeguards or the trust to survive what emerges.

As Burey explains, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but without the defenses or the reliance to survive what arises.’

Illustrative Story: Jason’s Experience

Burey demonstrates this phenomenon through the story of a worker, a deaf employee who chose to inform his co-workers about the culture of the deaf community and communication norms. His eagerness to discuss his background – a gesture of openness the office often commends as “genuineness” – briefly made everyday communications easier. However, Burey points out, that progress was unstable. Once personnel shifts eliminated the unofficial understanding Jason had built, the culture of access disappeared. “Everything he taught left with them,” he comments exhaustedly. What remained was the weariness of needing to begin again, of being held accountable for an company’s developmental journey. In Burey’s view, this demonstrates to be asked to reveal oneself without protection: to endanger oneself in a framework that celebrates your openness but declines to codify it into policy. Authenticity becomes a snare when companies rely on personal sharing rather than structural accountability.

Writing Style and Notion of Opposition

The author’s prose is both understandable and poetic. She blends academic thoroughness with a tone of connection: an offer for readers to engage, to question, to dissent. For Burey, workplace opposition is not noisy protest but moral resistance – the practice of resisting conformity in environments that expect appreciation for mere inclusion. To oppose, from her perspective, is to interrogate the narratives institutions describe about justice and acceptance, and to refuse engagement in practices that maintain inequity. It could involve identifying prejudice in a meeting, choosing not to participate of voluntary “equity” effort, or setting boundaries around how much of oneself is provided to the organization. Dissent, the author proposes, is an assertion of personal dignity in environments that frequently reward compliance. It constitutes a habit of integrity rather than opposition, a method of insisting that an individual’s worth is not dependent on corporate endorsement.

Reclaiming Authenticity

The author also avoids inflexible opposites. Her work does not simply toss out “authenticity” wholesale: instead, she urges its redefinition. For Burey, authenticity is far from the unrestricted expression of individuality that organizational atmosphere often celebrates, but a more deliberate correspondence between individual principles and one’s actions – a honesty that opposes distortion by corporate expectations. Rather than treating genuineness as a requirement to reveal too much or conform to sanitized ideals of openness, Burey urges readers to maintain the parts of it grounded in truth-telling, individual consciousness and moral understanding. In her view, the aim is not to discard sincerity but to shift it – to remove it from the executive theatrical customs and toward connections and offices where trust, fairness and responsibility make {